American negotiators tend to think big and respect the legal aspect of negotiation. Perhaps because of the size of the US market, American negotiators tend to think big and solve things from general to specific (deductive approach). Since they often get involved in big deals looking at the forest rather than the tree, quality issue rises as a big concern later in the process. The lack of attention to detail is quite evident in the American negotiation style, I think.
Graham and Sano (1986) describe that the American negotiation centering on action itself and decision making based on the notion of fair play.
The following shows their business negotiation attitudes:
"They often call for an informal ("Just call me James"), go to negotiation alone, are eager to "get to the point" and force his counterpart to "lay their cards on the table." They also live by the principle of "Don't take no for an answer" and "a deal is a deal" (Beechler and Bird, p. 64)
References:
Beechler, S.L. and Bird, A. (1999) Japanese Multinationals Abroad: Individual and organization learning. Oxford University Press.
Graham, J.L. and Sano, Y. (1986), ‘Across the negotiation table from the Japanese’, International Marketing Review, Vol. 3 No. 3, Autumn, pp. 58-71.
'조직 경영 & 리더십' 카테고리의 다른 글
리더에게 필요한 감성적 민첩성 (emotional agility) (0) | 2014.11.26 |
---|---|
영국에서의 초봉이란 (0) | 2014.11.05 |
Effective Management of Cross Cultural Negotiations 교차문화 협상의 효과적 운영론 (0) | 2012.11.01 |
한국 일본의 협상 문화차이 When Two Asian Negotiators Meet: The Korean and Japanese cross-cultural negotiation (0) | 2012.10.27 |
How Arabians negotiate (communicate) (0) | 2012.10.18 |